00
Stage 00 — Membership & Prerequisites
RMIG Membership — Mandatory for All Three Parties
WPSPs, Destination DOs, and Technology Providers must all be RMIG members before any operational activity can begin
▸ THREE-PARTY RMIG MODEL 1 MEMBERSHIP STRUCTURE
WPSPVolume Provider · Commercial Consolidator
Must be RMIG Member
Injects items into the postal stream. Generates all EDI events (EMA, ITMATT, EMB, EMC) — directly with own certified platform or via a certified Technology Provider. Holds bilateral agreements with each Destination DO. Responsible for all transport and delivery costs.
RMIG Membership Class: Volume Provider
↔
Destination DODesignated Operator · Last-Mile Delivery
Must be RMIG Member
Receives goods commercially, processes through the postal customs channel, delivers through the postal supply chain. Generates EMD, EDB, EMI events. Holds bilateral agreement with each WPSP. EDI messaging costs billed by UPU Telematics Cooperative.
RMIG Membership Class: Designated Operator
↔
Technology ProviderSolution Provider · Optional Party
Must be RMIG Member if Engaged
Provides UPU-TechCert certified infrastructure enabling the WPSP to inject data into Post*NET without building its own integration. The WPSP pays the Technology Provider's fees. Costs may be included in the bilateral or trilateral agreement.
RMIG Membership Class: Solution Provider
↔
UPU PTC / RMIGRegistry · Standards · Certification
Governing & Certifying Body
Issues S31 codes. Certifies Technology Provider platforms and WPSP own platforms via UPU-TechCert. Routes EDI via Post*NET. Maintains IPS, CDS.post, and GTT. Bills EDI messaging costs via Telematics Cooperative. Provides the optional UPU settlement system.
Role: Authority / Infrastructure / Certification
⚠️
Non-member cannot participate: A WPSP cannot inject items into the postal network under Model 1 without RMIG membership. A Destination DO cannot accept RMIG-model shipments without membership. A Technology Provider cannot offer injection services on behalf of a WPSP without its own RMIG membership and UPU-TechCert certification. The multilateral agreement is legally binding only between RMIG members.
🔌 Two Technology Pathways — WPSP Choice
Every WPSP must have a UPU-TechCert certified means of connecting to Post*NET and submitting EDI data to the EDI Engine. There are two valid pathways. The choice affects the agreement structure and commercial arrangements.
🏢
Pathway 1 — WPSP Own Certified Platform
WPSP builds and self-certifies its own Post*NET integration
The WPSP develops its own platform for generating S26 barcodes, submitting EDI events, and connecting to Post*NET. Before going live, the WPSP must obtain UPU-TechCert certification from the UPU PTC for its platform across all relevant domains and scopes.
Certification covers: EDI Engine API interface (EMA, ITMATT, EMB, EMC events); S26 barcode generation and nesting correctness; SCIS API consignment submission; CDS.post ITMATT transmission; and EAD sequencing compliance. Certification must be renewed every two years.
ℹ️
The WPSP applies to the UPU PTC as a vendor and must demonstrate correct interoperability with UPU systems before the certificate is issued. Certification cost is payable to the PTC in full before testing begins.
🤝
Pathway 2 — Certified Technology Provider
WPSP engages an RMIG-member Technology Provider with certified infrastructure
The WPSP engages a Technology Provider who is an RMIG member and holds UPU-TechCert certification. The TP acts as the technical intermediary between the WPSP's systems and Post*NET. The WPSP does not need its own UPU-TechCert certification — it operates under the TP's certified infrastructure.
The Technology Provider must: hold RMIG Solution Provider membership; hold valid UPU-TechCert certification for all interfaces used on behalf of WPSPs; be identified in the WPSP's RMIG documentation and bilateral agreements; and maintain its certification on a two-year renewal cycle independently.
TP costs are borne by the WPSP and may be structured as per-item, monthly platform, or volume-tiered fees. These costs may be explicitly included in the bilateral or trilateral agreement for transparency to all parties.
✅
Faster route to market: Using a certified Technology Provider eliminates the time and cost of building and certifying a proprietary integration, allowing the WPSP to go live significantly faster.
🚀 Strategic Advantages of RMIG Membership for WPSPs
RMIG membership as a Volume Provider gives WPSPs access to operational, commercial and competitive advantages unavailable through any other postal or logistics framework. The central value: one membership, one certification, access to all RMIG member Destination DOs and their postal customs channels worldwide.
01
Global Reach Through One Agreement
RMIG membership enables a WPSP to ship to all RMIG member Destination DOs through a single multilateral framework. Each additional corridor requires only a bilateral operational annex — not a new legal framework from scratch.
02
Postal Customs Channel for Every Destination
Items injected under RMIG Model 1 are processed through the postal customs channel at every Destination DO — offering simplified procedures, de minimis thresholds, and expedited clearance. This benefit applies simultaneously across all RMIG member destinations.
03
UPU Global Track & Trace — No Extra Integration
Every item is automatically tracked on the UPU Global Track & Trace (GTT) system from collection (EMA) through final delivery (EMI). Full end-to-end tracking transparency for shippers and recipients, using the mandatory EDI events — no additional integration required.
04
No Terminal Dues — Bilateral Delivery Pricing
Terminal dues apply only between Designated Operators. As a WPSP, delivery costs are bilaterally negotiated — giving full visibility and control over delivery pricing, enabling more accurate product costing and competitive rates for shippers and e-commerce platforms.
05
Governance Participation
RMIG members participate in the General Assembly and working groups, giving WPSPs a direct voice in developing the standards and commercial models that govern their own operations — alongside Designated Operators and the UPU International Bureau.
06
Access to UPU Technology Ecosystem
RMIG membership opens access to IPS (item tracking), CDS.post (electronic advance customs data), the UPU settlement system (cross-border payments), and UPU-TechCert (for Technology Provider solutions) — at rates governed by the UPU PTC Schedule of Charges.
📋 Scope, Purpose & Model Summary
This SOP governs the integration of Wider Postal Sector Players (WPSPs) — commercial consolidators, e-commerce platforms, and logistics providers — into the UPU global postal delivery network under RMIG Interoperability Model 1 (Direct Entry). The WPSP injects item-level EDI data directly into the UPU EDI Engine; the Destination DO delivers the items through its domestic postal network.
WPSP (Volume Provider)
Operates own origin facility · Holds RMIG membership · Generates all EDI events directly (Pathway 1) or via a certified Technology Provider (Pathway 2) · Engages freight forwarder for physical airline tender under commercial MWB · Pays Destination DO delivery costs bilaterally · Bears full liability for freight forwarder's acts
Destination DO (Designated Operator)
Holds RMIG membership · Receives goods via commercial channel · Designates postal customs channel with national customs authority · Generates EMD, EDB, EMI events · Delivers through postal supply chain · EDI messaging costs billed by UPU Telematics Cooperative · Bilateral agreement with each WPSP
Technology Provider (Solution Provider) — Optional
Holds RMIG membership as Solution Provider · Holds UPU-TechCert certification · Provides certified infrastructure enabling WPSP to connect to Post*NET without building own integration · Costs borne by WPSP · May be a named party in the bilateral or trilateral agreement
UPU PTC / RMIG
Issues S31 codes · Provides EDI Engine access · Certifies platforms via UPU-TechCert · Maintains IPS, CDS.post, Post*NET, GTT · Bills EDI costs to Destination DOs via Telematics Cooperative · Provides optional UPU settlement system
▸ MASTER END-TO-END FLOW — RMIG MODEL 1 (COMMERCIAL-TO-POST)
WPSPOrigin Facility
S31 + S26ID & Label
→
EMACollection
→
ITMATTCustoms Decl.
→
EMBConsolidation
→
EMCDeparture
→
SCIS/MWBConsignment API
Tech ProviderOptional — Pathway 2
Pathway 2 only — RMIG member · UPU-TechCert certified
→
EDI SubmissionOn behalf of WPSP
Freight FwdPhysical Agent
MWB IssuedCommercial AWB
→
EXAOrigin customs presented
→
EXCExport cleared
→
Tender to AirlineCargo handed over
No CARDIT · No RESDIT
Dest. DOe.g. Any Post
IPS + CDSData pull
→
EMDArrival OE
→
Postal CustomsEDB (postal ch.)
→
EMIFinal delivery
Supporting / generated by others
01
Stage 01 — Network Registration
Obtain S31 Network Identifier for the WPSP
Foundational prerequisite — required because S26 license plate nesting mandates an S31 issuer code
🔑 Why S31 Is Required — The S26 Nesting Dependency
UPU Standard S31 ("Assignment of Issuer Codes") governs the issuance of unique network identifiers to entities within the global postal system. For a WPSP, the S31 issuer code is not simply an administrative formality — it is a technical prerequisite for generating valid S26 license plate identifiers.
🔗 The S31 → S26 Dependency Explained
UPU Standard S26 ("License Plates for Parcels") defines how parcels are identified within the postal system using GS1-based Application Identifier barcodes. The S26 identifier encodes a serial shipment container code (SSCC-18) which is constructed from a GS1 Company Prefix — and for postal network participants, this prefix is derived directly from the S31 issuer code assigned to the WPSP by UPU PTC.
Without a valid S31 code, the WPSP cannot generate a globally unique, network-valid S26 barcode. Any S26 value constructed without a proper S31 prefix will be rejected by IPS at the destination DO's inward OE scan, and the corresponding ITMATT customs declaration will fail to link to the physical item. The entire tracking chain — from EMA event to EMI final delivery — depends on a correctly constructed S26 identifier rooted in the WPSP's S31 code.
Furthermore, the S26 nesting hierarchy (item → receptacle → consignment → MWB) that enables the Destination DO to pull all item data from IPS by scanning a single container is only possible when the S26 identifiers are globally unique and registered under the WPSP's S31 namespace.
📝 S31 Application Process
-
Apply to RMIG as a Member (Volume Provider category)
WPSP submits a formal RMIG membership application. Concurrently, the WPSP determines which technology pathway it will use: Pathway 1 (build own UPU-TechCert certified platform) or Pathway 2 (engage a certified Technology Provider who is also an RMIG member). The chosen pathway is declared in the membership application.
-
S31 Code Issued — Facility Registered
PTC assigns the WPSP's S31 issuer code. The origin facility receives an identifier that serves as the origin processing point in all EDI events. Both are registered on Post*NET and the UPU global registry.
-
EDI Engine Credentials Provisioned
WPSP receives EDI mailbox ID, application ID, and API token for https://ediapi.api.post/. Event mapping must be completed as the first API call before any items are submitted.
-
UPU-TechCert Certification (Pathway 1) or Technology Provider Engagement (Pathway 2)
Pathway 1: The WPSP submits its own platform for UPU-TechCert certification. The PTC conducts end-to-end testing across all five process stages. All mandatory events must pass before the WPSP may go live.
Pathway 2: The WPSP engages a certified Technology Provider. The TP's existing UPU-TechCert certificate covers the EDI integration. The WPSP still participates in end-to-end corridor testing with each Destination DO before going live.
⚖️ Bilateral Agreements Required
Because the WPSP operates without an Origin DO, it must conclude direct bilateral agreements with each Destination DO before going live on any corridor. These agreements govern two distinct cost categories:
| Agreement Area | Description |
| Transport Leg Costs | The WPSP is solely responsible for all costs of transporting consolidated cargo from its origin facility to the destination country. This includes freight forwarder fees, commercial MWB charges, airline cargo rates, and airport handling. These costs are not covered by any UPU terminal dues mechanism and are negotiated commercially between the WPSP and its logistics partners. |
| Delivery Costs (Destination DO) | The WPSP pays the Destination DO a bilaterally agreed delivery rate for each item delivered through the postal network. This rate covers inward OE processing, customs handling, sorting, and last-mile delivery. There are no UPU terminal dues in this model — terminal dues apply only between Designated Operators. The delivery payment rate is set in the bilateral agreement and notified to the UPU. |
| Prohibited Items & Liability | The bilateral agreement defines the WPSP's liability for prohibited items, undeliverable items, and loss or damage. The WPSP bears full responsibility for the freight forwarder's actions as its agent. |
💳
No Terminal Dues Apply: Terminal dues are a compensation mechanism between Designated Operators only. Since the WPSP is not a DO, the RMIG Model 1 delivery payment is governed entirely by the bilateral agreement — not the UPU terminal dues schedule.
02
Stage 02 — Item Identification
Mandatory S26 Item Identifier — Label, Nesting & Linkage
Applied at the WPSP origin facility — the primary identifier across the entire supply chain and the key for UPU Global Track & Trace
🏷️ S26 — The Sole Item Identifier in This Model
Every item the WPSP injects into the postal network must carry a valid S26 license plate barcode generated from the WPSP's S31 issuer code. This barcode is the single reference key used by all downstream systems: IPS at the Destination DO, CDS.post for customs pre-clearance, and the UPU Global Track & Trace system for end-customer visibility.
▸ S26 NESTING HIERARCHY — MWB LEVEL
// Master Air Waybill (Commercial)
MWB "999-12345678"
└── ULD Container
"AKE12345XX" // IATA ULD-ID
└── WPSP Receptacle
"[facility]EGCAIA26030100123456"
// 29-char receptacle ID
└── S26 Item Identifiers
// Each S26 built from S31 issuer code
"(00) 8<S31-prefix>000000001 4"
"(00) 8<S31-prefix>000000002 1"
"(00) 8<S31-prefix>000000003 9"
ℹ️
The S31 prefix embedded in every S26 barcode is what makes the item globally unique and network-recognisable. The Destination DO's IPS uses this prefix to identify the issuing entity and route queries back to the WPSP's EDI records.
S26 Label Requirements:
| Element | Requirement |
| Barcode symbology | GS1-128 or GS1 DataMatrix |
| SSCC-18 structure | Built from WPSP's S31 GS1 prefix |
| AI (420) — Dest. postcode | Destination country + postcode |
| Print quality grade | ISO/IEC 15416 minimum grade C |
| Uniqueness window | Not reused within 12 calendar months |
| Linkage to EMA | S26 value identical in all EDI submissions |
| Linkage to ITMATT | Same S26 used as itemIdentifier |
| Linkage to MWB / SCIS | S26 nested in receptacle → container → MWB |
03
Stage 03 — EDI Events
EDI Events Generated Entirely by the WPSP: EMA · ITMATT · EMB · EMC
All item-level EDI messages per the Global Postal Model — transmitted via the UPU EDI Engine API
⚙️ Pre-Condition: EventMappingConfiguration
Before any item events are submitted, the WPSP must call POST /EventMappingConfiguration to map its internal operational codes to UPU standard EDI event codes. This is a one-time setup that must be maintained if codes change.
▸ POST /EventMappingConfiguration — Full WPSP Mapping
{
"mapping": [
{ "code": "1", "ediEvent": "EMA", "mailUnitType": "MI", "mailFlow": "O", "name": "Item received at WPSP facility", "valid": true, "preferredReverseMapping": true },
{ "code": "2", "ediEvent": "EMB", "mailUnitType": "MI", "mailFlow": "O", "name": "Item consolidated into receptacle at WPSP", "valid": true },
{ "code": "3", "ediEvent": "EMC", "mailUnitType": "MI", "mailFlow": "O", "name": "Cargo departed — freight forwarder tendered to airline post-export clearance", "valid": true }
]
}
EMA EMA — Posting / Collection MANDATORY
Generated at item intake scan at the WPSP's facility. Creates the item record in IPS and anchors the S26 as the primary tracking key.
▸ POST /MailItems — EMA Event
{
"mailItems": [{
"itemIdentifier": "<S26-value>",
"originCountry": "[ISO-origin]",
"itemOriginOperator": "[WPSP-operator-code]",
"itemDestinationOperator": "[dest-DO-code]",
"destinationCountry": "[ISO-dest]",
"senderInformation": {
"name": "[Actual shipper name]",
// NOT the WPSP — the real shipper
"telephone": "[+XX...]",
"email": "[shipper@email]"
},
"addresseeInformation": { /* full recipient details */ },
"measureInformation": { "grossWeight": 2.5 },
"itemEvents": [{
"operationalEventCode": "1",
"eventTimeStamp": "[UTC ISO-8601]",
"processingPoint": {
"processingPointID": "[WPSP-facility-code]",
"processingPointType": "SOR"
}
}]
}]
}
CN23 ITMATT — Customs Declaration MANDATORY
Electronic equivalent of CN22/CN23. Must be in CDS.post before EMC is submitted. The WPSP is listed as the injecting entity in the sender identification.
▸ POST /CustomsDeclaration — ITMATT
{
"customsDeclarations": [{
"itemIdentifier": "<S26-value>",
"destinationOperator": "[dest-DO-code]",
"originOperator": "[WPSP-operator-code]",
"customers": {
"sender": {
"identification": {
"name": "[WPSP Entity Name]",
// WPSP as exporter of record
"reference": "[Business Reg. No.]"
},
"address": { /* WPSP facility address */ }
},
"addressee": { /* full recipient details */ }
},
"declaredGrossWeight": 2.5,
"customsTaxInformation": {
"totalDeclaredValue": {
"currencyCode": "USD", "amount": 150.00
},
"contentPieces": [{
"description": "[Accurate goods description]",
"tariffHeading": "[HS code 6-digit min]",
"originLocationCode": "[ISO country]",
"netWeight": 2.3,
"declaredValue": { "amount": 150.00 }
}]
}
}]
}
EMB EMB — Consolidation at WPSP Facility MANDATORY
Confirms items have been sorted and sealed into receptacles. All items must have EMA confirmed before EMB. The receptacle ID created here is the barcode physically attached to the bag/tray and referenced in the MWB consignment.
▸ POST /MailItems — EMB Event
{
"itemEvents": [{
"operationalEventCode": "2",
"eventTimeStamp": "[UTC ISO-8601]",
"eventOfficeOfExchange": "[WPSP-facility-code]",
"processingPoint": {
"processingPointID": "[WPSP-facility-code]",
"processingPointType": "OE"
// Facility acts as OE — no Origin DO
}
}]
}
ℹ️
The WPSP creates receptacle IDs using its assigned facility code in place of an IMPC. A physical receptacle manifest must be provided to the freight forwarder for airport handling reconciliation.
EMC EMC — Departure / Handover to Freight Forwarder MANDATORY
Marks the moment the WPSP hands over consolidated cargo to the freight forwarder. After this event IPS reflects "In Transit" to the Destination DO. The SCIS MWB submission must be complete at or before this point.
✅
Mandatory sequencing — WPSP system must enforce:
1. EMA confirmed for all items in batch ✓
2. ITMATT confirmed in CDS.post for all items ✓
3. EMB confirmed for all items ✓
4. POST /CargoConsignments (SCIS/MWB) submitted ✓
→ Only then submit EMC
▸ POST /MailItems — EMC Event
{
"itemEvents": [{
"operationalEventCode": "3",
"eventTimeStamp": "[handover time UTC]",
// = time cargo handed to freight forwarder
"eventOfficeOfExchange": "[WPSP-facility-code]",
"processingPoint": {
"processingPointID": "[departure-airport-IATA]",
"processingPointType": "OE"
}
}]
}
04
Stage 04 — Transport Layer
Commercial MWB via Freight Forwarder — SCIS API Consignment Submission
Freight Forwarder presents to Origin Customs · Export cleared · MWB issued · SCIS API submission · No CARDIT · No RESDIT
✈️ Commercial-to-Post Transport — How It Works
This is a purely commercial-to-post model. Before the cargo reaches the airline, the WPSP's freight forwarder presents the consolidated shipment to origin country customs for export clearance. The EXA event (presented to export customs) and EXC event (export cleared) are recorded. Only after export clearance is granted does the freight forwarder tender the cargo to the airline under a commercial Master Air Waybill (MWB). The airline has no postal EDI relationship with the WPSP — it handles the cargo as standard commercial freight. There is no postal AWB, no CARDIT, and no RESDIT.
The Destination DO receives the goods through the commercial channel (airport freight terminal), then brings them into the postal supply chain. From the moment the Destination DO takes custody, the items move through the standard postal process: postal customs → sorting → last-mile delivery.
The WPSP submits transport data electronically via the SCIS API (POST /CargoConsignments), which links the MWB to the postal receptacles and S26 item identifiers. This is the electronic bridge between the commercial transport layer and the postal tracking layer.
🛃 Origin Customs — Export Clearance (EXA → EXC)
Before any cargo can depart the origin country on a commercial or postal basis, it must be presented to the origin country customs authority for export clearance. In the RMIG Model 1 Commercial-to-Post flow, this is the responsibility of the freight forwarder acting as the WPSP's agent at the origin airport or freight terminal. Two EDI events mark this process:
📋 EXA — Item Presented to Export Customs
The freight forwarder presents the consolidated shipment manifest and individual item declarations to the origin customs authority. The WPSP should submit the EXA event via POST /MailItems at the point of customs presentation. The ITMATT data already in CDS.post provides the electronic advance data that origin customs may use for risk assessment.
Origin customs performs security screening, verifies the export declaration against the declared contents and values, checks for prohibited or restricted goods, and confirms that all items are eligible for export.
✅ EXC — Export Clearance Granted
Once origin customs is satisfied, export clearance is granted. The EXC event is submitted to confirm the items have been returned from customs and are cleared for export. Only at this point does the freight forwarder proceed to tender the cargo physically to the airline.
The sequence is therefore: EMB (consolidated) → SCIS API (MWB submitted) → EXA (presented to origin customs) → EXC (export cleared) → freight forwarder tenders to airline → EMC (departed). EXA and EXC sit between SCIS submission and EMC.
⚠️
Practical note on EXA/EXC in this model: Because the freight forwarder handles physical customs presentation on the WPSP's behalf, the WPSP must have a data feed from its freight forwarder confirming the customs presentation time and clearance decision. This data is then used to submit the EXA and EXC events to the EDI Engine with accurate timestamps. The freight forwarder's operational process must be integrated with the WPSP's EDI system to ensure these events are submitted promptly and in the correct sequence before EMC.
ℹ️
Origin customs channel: Because this is a commercial consolidation model (not a postal dispatch), the origin customs presentation is handled through the commercial export channel — not the postal export channel. The freight forwarder files commercial export declarations (e.g. China Customs electronic manifest, EU ECS, US AES) in addition to the UPU EXA/EXC events recorded in the EDI Engine. Both the commercial customs filing and the EDI event submission are required.
📤 SCIS API — MWB-Based Consignment Submission
The POST /CargoConsignments call links the commercial MWB (the airline-level identifier) down through the ULD container, the postal receptacles, and to individual S26 item identifiers. This complete nesting enables the Destination DO to retrieve all item-level data from IPS by scanning any level of the hierarchy.
▸ POST /CargoConsignments — MWB-BASED SCIS SUBMISSION
{
"cargoConsignments": [{
"senderReferenceNo": "[WPSP-internal-ref]",
"billNo": "[MWB-Number]",
// Master Air Waybill — issued by freight forwarder
"transportSegments": [{
"transportMode": 1, // 1 = Air
"transportNo": "[Flight-Number]",
"departureDate": "[UTC ISO-8601]",
"arrivalDate": "[UTC ISO-8601]",
"transportCompanyCode": "[IATA-airline-code]",
"transportCompanyCodeSource": "IATA",
"departureLocationCode": "[origin-IATA-airport]",
"arrivalLocationCode": "[dest-IATA-airport]"
}],
"containers": [{
"identifier": "[ULD-identifier]",
// e.g. "AKE12345XX"
"identifierSource": "IATA",
"receptacles": [
"[29-char-receptacle-ID-1]",
"[29-char-receptacle-ID-2]"
// All receptacles in this ULD
]
}]
}]
}
// Item-to-receptacle linkage is established at EMB event.
// IPS resolves: MWB → ULD → Receptacle → S26 items.
🚛 Freight Forwarder Responsibilities
| Action | Party |
| Issue commercial MWB | Freight Forwarder |
| Physical tender to airline | Freight Forwarder |
| Security screening coordination | Freight Forwarder |
| Provide MWB number to WPSP | Freight Forwarder |
SCIS API / POST /CargoConsignments | WPSP |
| All EDI events (EMA/ITMATT/EMB/EMC) | WPSP |
| Liability for transit cargo | WPSP (FF as agent) |
🚫 No CARDIT · No RESDIT
CARDIT is a message sent from a Designated Operator to an airline carrier within the postal EDI network. RESDIT is the airline's response. Neither message is applicable in this model because:
1. There is no Origin DO to generate CARDIT;
2. The cargo travels under a commercial MWB, not a postal AWB;
3. The airline has no postal EDI relationship with the WPSP.
All transport data is communicated via the SCIS API only. Each Destination DO must be informed at bilateral agreement stage that transport data arrives via SCIS/EDI API — not via CARDIT.
05
Stage 05 — Destination Processing
Postal Customs Channel · IPS · CDS.post · UPU Global Track & Trace
The Destination DO receives goods commercially, processes them through the postal customs channel, and delivers through the postal supply chain
🛃 Postal Customs Channel — Defined and Activated by the Destination DO
This is a fundamental characteristic of the Commercial-to-Post model: although cargo arrives via the commercial airline channel, customs clearance is processed through the postal customs channel — not the commercial import channel. This distinction determines which customs procedures, thresholds, and duty rates apply, and it is the Destination DO's responsibility to designate and operate the postal customs channel for items received from WPSPs.
🏛️ What "Postal Customs Channel" Means
Most countries operate two distinct customs clearance pathways for incoming international goods: a commercial channel (for commercial imports, typically requiring a commercial invoice, customs broker, and formal entry) and a postal channel (for items arriving through the postal network, handled by the Postal Operator using simplified customs procedures, de minimis thresholds, and EDI-based pre-clearance data).
Under RMIG Model 1, the Destination DO designates these shipments as postal items even though they arrived on a commercial flight. The DO presents items to customs through its postal customs interface — using the CUSITM message (generated from the WPSP's ITMATT data in CDS.post) sent to the national customs authority. The customs authority processes the items under postal import procedures, and responds with a CUSRSP message (release or hold decision).
The Destination DO must formally establish this postal customs designation with its national customs authority as a prerequisite to accepting WPSP shipments. The bilateral agreement between the WPSP and the Destination DO must confirm that postal customs procedures apply and specify how duties, if any, will be collected from the consignee.
IPS Pull
On EMC receipt, Destination DO's IPS pre-loads all item records. S26 scan at inward OE returns sender, addressee, weight, event history, and consignment linkage in real time.
CDS.post → Customs
ITMATT data from WPSP is in CDS.post before arrival. Destination DO generates CUSITM and sends to national customs. CUSRSP returns clearance decision and any duties assessed.
EDI API Pull
Destination DO queries EDI Engine API for consignment data (MWB, ULD, receptacle → S26 nesting). Replaces the CARDIT data that would come from an Origin DO in a standard postal flow.
🌐 UPU Global Track & Trace — End-to-End Shipment Visibility
Every EMSEVT message transmitted through the EDI Engine — from the WPSP's EMA event at origin through the Destination DO's EMI final delivery — is automatically published to the UPU Global Track & Trace (GTT) system, maintained by the UPU Postal Technology Centre. This provides full supply chain visibility to the WPSP, shippers, and recipients without any additional integration work beyond the mandatory EDI events.
EMACollection
→
EMBConsolidation
→
EMCDeparture
→
EMDArrived Dest.
→
EDBCustoms
→
EMGDelivery Office
→
EMIFinal Delivery
Public tracking access: End recipients and shippers can track their items using the S26 identifier at:
UPU Global Track & Trace — public portal maintained by UPU PTC
WPSP integration options:
| Option | Description |
| Public GTT portal | Customers self-serve at globaltracktrace.ptc.post |
| IPS API polling | WPSP queries event updates via EDI Engine API |
| WPSP own portal | Embed GTT data via UPU API into own tracking page |
🔄 Destination DO Processing Workflow
-
Pre-Arrival: IPS & CDS.post Synchronisation
On receiving EMC from the WPSP via IPS, the Destination DO pre-loads all item records. CDS.post makes ITMATT data available to national customs for advance risk scoring. Items can be provisionally cleared before the flight lands.
-
Physical Arrival via Commercial Channel — Postal Custody Begins
The Destination DO collects cargo from the airport freight terminal (commercial channel). From this point, items enter the postal supply chain. The DO scans the ULD or receptacle — IPS returns all linked S26 item data automatically.
-
EMD — Arrival at Inward OE MANDATORY (Dest. DO)
Destination DO generates EMD event confirming physical receipt. This is returned to the WPSP via IPS and immediately updates the UPU Global Track & Trace system. The WPSP's tracking portal reflects "Arrived at Destination" for end-customer visibility.
-
EDB — Postal Customs Presentation via CDS.post MANDATORY (Dest. DO)
Destination DO generates CUSITM from the WPSP's ITMATT data and submits to national customs authority via its CDS.post postal customs interface. Customs responds with CUSRSP. Items are processed under postal customs procedures — not commercial import procedures.
-
EMG / EMI — Sorting, Dispatch & Final Delivery
After customs clearance, items move through the Destination DO's DPS (Domestic Postal System). S26 scans at each facility update IPS and GTT. EMI (final delivery) is generated and visible to the WPSP and end-customer in real time.
💰 Financial Arrangements — Complete Cost Framework
The Commercial-to-Post model replaces the traditional UPU terminal dues mechanism with a set of bilateral and platform-based financial arrangements. Each cost category has a clearly defined responsible party and settlement mechanism.
Transport Leg Costs
Borne by WPSP
WPSP pays entirely
All costs of moving cargo from the WPSP's origin facility to the destination country's airport: freight forwarder fees, commercial MWB charges, airline cargo rates, fuel surcharges, and airport handling fees. These are commercially negotiated between the WPSP and its logistics partners — no UPU mechanism governs them.
Delivery Costs
Bilaterally Agreed — Paid by WPSP
Bilateral rate — No Terminal Dues
The WPSP pays the Destination DO a per-item delivery rate agreed in the bilateral operational agreement. This covers inward OE handling, customs presentation, sorting, and last-mile delivery. There are no UPU terminal dues in this model — terminal dues apply only between Designated Operators and are not applicable to WPSP-to-DO flows.
EDI Messaging Costs
Borne by Destination DO
Billed by UPU Telematics Group
The cost of EDI message transmission on the Post*NET network — including EMSEVT, ITMATT, and CUSITM/CUSRSP exchanges — is borne by the Destination DO and billed by the UPU Telematics Cooperative (TC) based on message volume. WPSPs are subject to a 10% surcharge on PTC schedule rates for services they access directly. The WPSP and Destination DO should address EDI cost allocation in their bilateral agreement to avoid disputes.
💳
Optional: UPU Settlement Platform — The WPSP and Destination DOs may optionally use the UPU settlement system (managed through the International Bureau) for bilateral payment of delivery costs. This provides a standardised, auditable settlement mechanism and can simplify multi-corridor accounting for WPSPs operating with several Destination DOs simultaneously. Participation is optional and must be agreed by both parties in the bilateral operational agreement. The UPU settlement system does not replace the bilaterally agreed rate — it is only the payment channel.
📊 Complete Requirements Matrix
Key terms used in this matrix are defined in the Glossary below. Legend: Mandatory Technology Provider (Pathway 2) Optional
| Requirement |
WPSP |
Tech Provider (if Pathway 2) |
Freight Forwarder |
Airline |
Destination DO |
UPU PTC/TC |
| RMIG Membership | | | — | — | | |
| S31 Network Identifier (for S26 nesting) | | — | — | — | — | |
| S26 Barcode Generation & Label Printing | | | — | — | — | — |
| EventMappingConfiguration (EDI Engine) | | | — | — | — | — |
| POST /MailItems — EMA Event | | | — | — | — | — |
| POST /CustomsDeclaration — ITMATT | | | — | — | — | — |
| POST /MailItems — EMB Event | | | — | — | — | — |
| EAD sequence enforcement (ITMATT before EMC) | | | — | — | — | — |
| POST /MailItems — EMC Event | | | — | — | — | — |
| Issue Commercial MWB | — | — | | — | — | — |
| Physical Cargo Tender to Airline | — | — | | — | — | — |
| POST /CargoConsignments (SCIS/MWB) | | | — | — | — | — |
| EXA — Presented to Origin Customs | | | | — | — | — |
| EXC — Export Clearance Confirmed | | | | — | — | — |
| CARDIT to Airline | Not applicable — Commercial-to-Post model uses MWB + SCIS API only. No CARDIT. No RESDIT. |
| Bilateral/Trilateral Agreement — Transport, Delivery & TP Costs | | | — | — | | — |
| Postal Customs Channel Designation | — | — | — | — | | — |
| IPS S26 Scan Compatibility at Inward OE | — | — | — | — | | — |
| CDS.post → National Customs Integration | — | — | — | — | | — |
| EMD — Arrival Confirmation (GTT updated) | — | — | — | — | | — |
| EDB — Postal Customs Presentation (CUSITM) | — | — | — | — | | — |
| EMI — Final Delivery Confirmation (GTT updated) | — | — | — | — | | — |
| EDI Messaging Costs (billed by UPU Telematics) | Indirect | — | — | — | | |
| UPU GTT Tracking — Public Visibility | Auto | — | — | — | Auto via IPS | |
| UPU Settlement System (Optional) | | — | — | — | | Facilitates |
| UPU-TechCert Certification (own) or via TP | | | — | — | | |
Mandatory
Technology Provider executes on behalf of WPSP (Pathway 2)
Optional
Authority / issuing / billing role
📖 Glossary of Key Terms
WPSP
Wider Postal Sector Player — commercial entity (consolidator, platform, logistics provider) integrating with the postal network under RMIG.
DO
Designated Operator — national postal operator authorised by a UPU member country.
RMIG
Ready to Market Interoperability Group — UPU POC body governing the three DO-WPSP interoperability models.
S31
UPU Standard — "Assignment of Issuer Codes". Provides the WPSP its unique network identity and the GS1 prefix needed to construct valid S26 barcodes.
S26
UPU Standard — "License Plates for Parcels". GS1-based barcode (SSCC-18) applied to every item. Requires S31 prefix for global uniqueness and network validity.
MWB
Master Air Waybill — commercial airline document issued by the freight forwarder. The root transport identifier in the SCIS API nesting hierarchy for this model.
SCIS
Supply Chain Information System — UPU API for transport data linking MWB → ULD → Receptacle → S26 items. Replaces CARDIT in this model.
IPS
International Postal System — UPU's core EDI platform. Receives all EMSEVT events and makes item data available to the Destination DO on S26 scan.
CDS.post
Customs Declaration System — holds ITMATT data from WPSP and interfaces with national customs authorities for advance clearance.
GTT
UPU Global Track & Trace — public tracking portal at globaltracktrace.ptc.post. Automatically populated by all EMSEVT events transmitted via IPS.
EMA
EDI event: Posting/Collection — first tracking event; item received at WPSP facility. Creates IPS record.
ITMATT
Item Attributes message — electronic customs declaration (equivalent to CN22/CN23). Must reach CDS.post before EMC.
EMB
EDI event: Arrival at Outward OE — item consolidated into receptacle at WPSP facility.
EMC
EDI event: Departure — cargo handed to airline by freight forwarder after origin customs export clearance (EXC). Last mandatory event generated by WPSP before the destination DO takes over.
EMD
EDI event: Arrival at Inward OE — generated by Destination DO. Updates GTT to "Arrived at destination".
EDB
EDI event: Presented to Import Customs — Destination DO submits CUSITM via postal customs channel.
EMI
EDI event: Final Delivery — generated by Destination DO. Updates GTT to "Delivered".
EXA
EDI event: Item Presented to Export Customs — freight forwarder presents consolidated cargo to origin customs authority. Submitted by WPSP (or TP) after EMB and before EMC.
EXC
EDI event: Returned from Export Customs (Export Cleared) — origin customs has granted export clearance. Submitted by WPSP (or TP). Freight forwarder may only physically tender to airline after EXC.
CARDIT
Carrier Document — postal-to-airline EDI message. NOT used in this model. No CARDIT, no RESDIT.
Postal Customs
The customs clearance channel operated by the Destination DO using simplified postal procedures and CUSITM/CDS.post — distinct from commercial import customs.
Terminal Dues
UPU remuneration between Designated Operators for delivery costs. Does NOT apply to WPSP-to-DO flows. Delivery payment is bilaterally agreed.
TC / Telematics
UPU Telematics Cooperative — the user-funded subsidiary body governing the PTC. Bills Destination DOs for EDI message volume on Post*NET.
EAD
Electronic Advance Data — the requirement for customs data (ITMATT) to be in CDS.post before the item departs the origin country (before EMC).
Tech Provider
Technology Provider (Solution Provider) — RMIG member holding UPU-TechCert certification. Provides certified Post*NET infrastructure enabling WPSPs to operate under Pathway 2 without building their own integration. Costs borne by WPSP; may be named in the bilateral or trilateral agreement.
TechCert
UPU-TechCert — the UPU PTC certification program for vendors and WPSPs. Certifies correct interoperability with UPU systems per domain and scope. Mandatory for Pathway 1 WPSPs and for all Technology Providers. Must be renewed every two years.
Pathway 1
WPSP builds and self-certifies its own UPU-TechCert platform for Post*NET connection and EDI submission. Full autonomy; higher upfront investment and time to market.
Pathway 2
WPSP engages a certified Technology Provider (RMIG Solution Provider member) to handle Post*NET connection and EDI submission on its behalf. Faster time to market; Technology Provider costs borne by WPSP.
SwiftLogix
Author of this document. Technical reference contributor to the UPU RMIG. This document is SwiftLogix intellectual property.
★
Real-World Case Study — RMIG Model 1 in Action
Cainiao × AliExpress × Egypt Post
How a commercial consolidator ships from China to Egypt through the postal network — a step-by-step walkthrough using real companies
🌍 Background & Context
AliExpress has millions of customers in Egypt who buy products from Chinese sellers daily. Those products are collected, consolidated, and shipped internationally by Cainiao — Alibaba Group's global logistics arm and an existing UPU Consultative Committee (CC) member. This case study shows exactly how RMIG Model 1 makes that flow work through the postal network, end-to-end.
In this scenario, Cainiao acts as both the WPSP (responsible for EDI and postal network injection) and the Technology Provider (it has its own certified technology infrastructure). AliExpress generates shipping labels using Cainiao's S31-based GS1 prefix. Goods travel by air from Shenzhen to Cairo and are delivered to Egyptian buyers by Egypt Post — an RMIG member Designated Operator.
AliExpress
Online Marketplace
Generates shipping orders & S26 labelsSeller ships item to Cainiao warehouse. AliExpress system generates S26 label using Cainiao's S31 GS1 prefix. Hands item to Cainiao for consolidation.
Cainiao
WPSP + Tech Provider
RMIG member · UPU CC memberGenerates all mandatory EDI events (EMA, ITMATT, EMB, EXA, EXC, EMC). Consolidates cargo. Submits MWB via SCIS API. Engages freight forwarder for origin customs and airline tender.
Airline
Air Cargo — Commercial
No postal EDI relationshipTransports cargo under commercial MWB issued by Cainiao's freight forwarder. No CARDIT received. No RESDIT sent. Standard freight handling.
Egypt Post
Destination DO — RMIG Member
Receives, clears & deliversCollects cargo from Cairo airport freight terminal. Presents to postal customs. Sorts and delivers to Egyptian buyers. Bilateral delivery agreement with Cainiao.
🗺️ End-to-End Flow — All Steps at a Glance
Orange-bordered boxes are mandatory EDI events. Plain boxes are physical or supporting steps. The UPU GTT row shows that every event is published to public tracking automatically.
Cainiao
WPSP + Tech Provider
Freight Forwarder
Physical Only
Airline
Air Cargo
UPU Systems
IPS · CDS.post · GTT
Egypt Post
Destination DO
S31 + S26RMIG joined · label generated
EMAItem received, Shenzhen
ITMATTCustoms data → CDS.post
EMBConsolidated into receptacle
SCIS APIMWB submitted
EXAPresented to China Customs
EXCExport cleared ✓
EMCDeparted · cargo with airline
MWB IssuedCommercial AWB at booking
Origin CustomsPresents cargo for export clearance
Cargo ClearedExport approved by China Customs
Tender to AirlinePhysical handover at PVG
No CARDITNo RESDIT
Flight PVG→CAIShenzhen to Cairo
Arrives CairoCAI airport
IPS UpdatedAll events live
CDS.postITMATT available
GTT UpdatedPublic tracking live
SCIS DataConsignment info
EMDArrived at Cairo OE
EDBPostal customs presented
EDCCustoms cleared
EMIDelivered to buyer
Physical / supporting step
Explicitly not applicable
📋 Step-by-Step Walkthrough
Step 1
1
Action
Cainiao applies to RMIG as a Volume Provider. Already a UPU CC member, this simplifies approval. Applies to UPU PTC for an S31 issuer code. Receives EDI Engine credentials and facility code for Shenzhen warehouse.
EDI / Action
RMIG Registration
Why S31 is the critical first step
- S31 gives Cainiao its unique GS1 company prefix
- This prefix is embedded in every S26 barcode on every AliExpress parcel
- Without S31, barcodes are not globally unique and will be rejected by Egypt Post's IPS at Cairo
- The entire tracking chain from EMA to EMI depends on a valid S31-rooted S26 identifier
What Cainiao also receives
- EDI Engine mailbox ID and API token for ediapi.api.post
- Shenzhen warehouse facility code (acts as origin OE)
- Access to CDS.post for ITMATT submission
- UPU-TechCert certification path confirmed (Pathway 1 — own platform)
Step 2
2
Party
AliExpress / Cainiao
Action
When an Egyptian customer places an order, the Cainiao system generates an S26 license plate barcode using Cainiao's S31 GS1 prefix. The label is printed and applied to the parcel before collection — it is the item's identity for its entire journey from Shenzhen to Cairo.
EDI / Action
S26 Label Print
What the S26 barcode contains
- SSCC-18 number built from Cainiao's S31 GS1 prefix
- Destination country and postcode (Egypt / Cairo area)
- Unique 6-digit item reference — never reused within 12 months
- Check digit for scan validation at every facility
Where this barcode is used across the journey
- EMA — as
itemIdentifier in POST /MailItems
- ITMATT — links customs declaration to the physical item
- EMB — links item to its receptacle bag
- Egypt Post scans it at Cairo OE to pull all data from IPS instantly
Step 3
3
Party
Cainiao
Shenzhen Warehouse
Action
Parcel arrives at Cainiao's Shenzhen facility. Scanned, weighed, entered into the system. Cainiao immediately submits the EMA event (item received at origin) and the ITMATT customs declaration (electronic CN23) to the UPU network. The ITMATT must reach CDS.post before the flight departs — this is the EAD requirement.
EDI Message
EMSEVT / ITMATT
EMA Event — what it does
- Creates the item record in UPU IPS — Egypt Post can now see this parcel
- Sender: actual AliExpress seller name (not Cainiao)
- Recipient: Egyptian buyer's full address and phone
- First tracking update appears on UPU Global Track & Trace (GTT)
ITMATT — the electronic customs declaration
- Must be in CDS.post before EMC — EAD requirement
- Sender in ITMATT: Cainiao (exporter of record)
- Contents: accurate goods description, HS code, declared USD value
- Egypt Post's customs interface reads this for advance risk scoring
- Pre-clearance begins before the flight even departs Shenzhen
Step 4
4
Party
Cainiao
Shenzhen Warehouse
Action
Cainiao sorts all Egypt-bound parcels (and parcels for other RMIG member DOs) into postal bags called receptacles. Each bag gets a 29-character UPU receptacle barcode. The EMB event is submitted for each item — linking it to its receptacle. This creates the nesting chain: S26 item → receptacle → container → MWB.
What happens at consolidation
- Parcels sorted by destination country and postal area
- All Egypt-bound items go into Egypt-labelled receptacles
- Cainiao can consolidate for multiple RMIG member DOs simultaneously
- Receptacle labels printed with 29-character UPU barcodes, bags sealed
Why the receptacle scan at Cairo matters
- Egypt Post scans one 29-char barcode at Cairo airport
- IPS instantly returns all item data for every parcel inside
- No paper manifest needed — completely electronic
- Cainiao can do this for Egypt Post and multiple other DOs in one run
Step 5
5
Action
Cainiao's freight forwarder issues a commercial Master Air Waybill (MWB) for the consolidated cargo. Cainiao immediately submits this MWB to the UPU EDI Engine via POST /CargoConsignments — the SCIS API. This links the MWB to the ULD container, the receptacles inside it, and through them to every S26 item. This replaces CARDIT entirely.
What the SCIS API call contains
- MWB number from the freight forwarder
- Flight number and route: e.g. PVG → CAI
- Departure and arrival date/time
- ULD container identifier (e.g. AKE12345CN)
- List of all receptacle IDs inside that container
No CARDIT · No RESDIT — why
- CARDIT is a message between a postal operator and an airline
- Cainiao is a WPSP — not a postal operator
- Cargo travels under a commercial MWB, not a postal AWB
- The airline has no postal EDI relationship with Cainiao
- Egypt Post is notified of this via the bilateral agreement
Step 6
6
Party
Freight Forwarder
On behalf of Cainiao
Action
Cainiao's freight forwarder presents the consolidated shipment at Shanghai Pudong (PVG) freight terminal to Chinese Customs for export clearance. The forwarder files the commercial export declaration. Cainiao submits the EXA event (presented to origin customs). Chinese Customs screens the cargo — x-ray inspection, export prohibition checks, value verification. Once cleared, the EXC event is submitted confirming export approval. Only then may the cargo physically move to the airline.
EDI Message
EMSEVT (EXA / EXC)
What Chinese Customs checks (EXA)
- Commercial export declaration filed by the freight forwarder
- Contents match declared ITMATT data already in CDS.post
- No prohibited or restricted export items (e.g. controlled electronics)
- Declared values and quantities accurate
- X-ray security screening — standard for all air cargo departing China
After export clearance (EXC)
- EXC event submitted by Cainiao — export clearance confirmed in IPS
- Freight forwarder now physically moves cargo to the airline acceptance zone
- This is the only point at which physical handover to the airline is permitted
- EMC event (Step 7) is submitted immediately after — departure confirmed
- Cainiao must receive clearance confirmation from FF to submit EXC accurately
Step 7
7
Action
The freight forwarder completes physical handover of cargo to the airline at PVG. Export has been cleared by Chinese Customs. At this moment Cainiao submits the EMC event — not when the plane takes off, but when custody transfers to the carrier. This signals to Egypt Post via IPS that the shipment is "In Transit". All items are marked Departed in IPS and GTT.
🔒
Mandatory sequencing rule — Cainiao's system must enforce this: EMA confirmed ✓ → ITMATT in CDS.post ✓ → EMB confirmed ✓ → SCIS/MWB submitted ✓ → EMC submitted. Submitting EMC before ITMATT is confirmed in CDS.post is an EAD violation. Cainiao bears full legal liability. The EDI Engine does not enforce this automatically — Cainiao's own system must.
Step 8
8
Party
UPU Systems /
Egypt Post
Action
The moment Cainiao submits EMC, three things happen automatically at the Egypt Post end — before the aircraft departs. IPS receives the full event chain. CDS.post makes ITMATT available to Egyptian customs. SCIS API provides flight and container data. Egypt Post can begin advance processing and risk-scoring immediately.
IPS — Postal System
- EMA, EMB, EMC events visible
- Full item records loaded
- Items marked "In Transit — Departed"
- Egypt Post operations can see what is coming
CDS.post — Customs
- ITMATT from Cainiao available
- Egypt Post sends CUSITM to Egyptian Customs
- Advance risk assessment performed
- Low-risk items pre-cleared before landing
SCIS API — Transport
- MWB, ULD, receptacle data available
- Flight number and ETA known
- No CARDIT received — bilateral agreement confirms this
- Warehouse team can prepare for arrival
Step 9
9
Party
Egypt Post
Cairo Inward OE
Action
Flight lands at Cairo International. Egypt Post collects the ULD containers from the airline's freight terminal — the commercial channel handover. Egypt Post scans the receptacle barcode at its inward Office of Exchange. IPS instantly returns all item data for every parcel inside. Egypt Post submits EMD confirming physical arrival.
What EMD confirms
- Physical receipt acknowledged — Cainiao is notified via IPS
- AliExpress buyers see "Arrived at destination country" on GTT
- Egypt Post's delivery clock starts for bilateral SLA commitments
- One receptacle scan = all item data — no paper manifest required
Goods move from commercial → postal channel
- From this moment items are in Egypt Post's custody
- Processed under postal supply chain procedures
- RESDES (receipt of dispatch) also generated at this point
- Any discrepancies flagged immediately against SCIS data
Step 10
10
Party
Egypt Post +
Egyptian Customs
Action
Egypt Post generates a CUSITM message from Cainiao's ITMATT data in CDS.post and submits it to the Egyptian Customs Authority through its postal customs interface. This is the key RMIG advantage — items are processed through postal customs, not commercial import customs. Customs returns a CUSRSP response, clearing items or flagging for inspection.
EDI Message
CUSITM / CUSRSP
Postal Customs vs. Commercial Customs
- Commercial customs: formal declarations, customs broker required, slow and expensive
- Postal customs: simplified procedures, de minimis thresholds, EDI-based pre-clearance, fast and lower cost
- Egypt Post designates this as a postal channel with its national customs authority
- Items below Egypt's de minimis threshold clear automatically
What ITMATT data powers customs clearance
- Goods description: e.g. "Wireless Earphones"
- HS tariff code: e.g. 8518.10
- Declared value in USD: e.g. USD 29.99
- Country of origin: China (CN)
- All submitted by Cainiao at Step 3 — no re-submission needed here
Step 11
11
Action
Customs clears items (EDC event). Egypt Post loads them onto its vehicles and transports to the national sorting centre. The DPS (Domestic Postal System) uses the S26 barcode to route each parcel to the correct delivery office. EMF (departed from OE) and EMG (arrived at delivery office) events are generated automatically at each scan point.
S26 barcode at every scan point
- Sorting centre scan → IPS updated → GTT shows "In Sorting"
- Delivery office scan → IPS updated → GTT shows "At Delivery Office"
- Every scan updates Cainiao's tracking data via IPS
- AliExpress buyer sees real-time status on the AliExpress app via GTT
Financial settlement at this stage
- Egypt Post collects bilaterally agreed per-item delivery rate from Cainiao
- Any customs duties collected from the Egyptian buyer directly
- Egypt Post's EDI messaging costs billed by UPU Telematics Cooperative
- Optional: UPU settlement system used for Cainiao → Egypt Post payment
Step 12
12
Party
Egypt Post
Delivery Postman
Action
Egypt Post's delivery postman scans the parcel at the buyer's door or post office counter and the buyer receives their AliExpress order. The EMI event (final delivery) is submitted to the EDI Engine. IPS and UPU GTT update instantly. Cainiao, AliExpress, and the Egyptian buyer all see "Delivered" on their tracking interfaces.
Complete Tracking Chain — EMA to EMI — All Visible on globaltracktrace.ptc.post
EMACainiao — Collected
→
EMBConsolidated
→
EXAOrigin Customs
→
EXCExport Cleared
→
EMCDeparted China
→
EMDArrived Cairo
→
EDBPostal Customs
→
EMGDelivery Office
→
EMIDelivered ✓
Purple = generated by Cainiao (WPSP) · Orange = origin customs events (EXA/EXC) · Teal = generated by Egypt Post (Destination DO)
💰 Financial Arrangements — This Example
| Cost Type |
Who Pays |
Who Receives |
Governed By |
| Air Transport (PVG→CAI) |
Cainiao — commercial freight rate |
Airline (via freight forwarder) |
Commercial contract — not UPU |
| Last-Mile Delivery |
Cainiao pays Egypt Post |
Egypt Post |
Bilateral agreement — no terminal dues |
| EDI Messaging |
Egypt Post (billed by Telematics) |
UPU Telematics Cooperative |
UPU PTC Schedule of Charges |
| Customs Duties |
Egyptian buyer (if applicable) |
Egyptian Customs Authority |
Egyptian customs regulations |
| Settlement (Optional) |
Cainiao via UPU settlement system |
Egypt Post |
UPU settlement (bilateral opt-in) |
🎯 Key Takeaways from This Example
For the WPSP — Cainiao
- One RMIG membership opens all RMIG member Destination DOs simultaneously
- Cainiao already has the technology — it needs UPU-TechCert, not a new platform
- All EDI submitted from Shenzhen — no Origin DO required
- Items enter postal customs at every destination — faster and cheaper than commercial
- Full end-to-end GTT tracking at no extra integration cost beyond mandatory events
- No terminal dues — delivery rate agreed directly with Egypt Post
For the Destination DO — Egypt Post
- Revenue from bilaterally agreed per-item delivery payments from Cainiao
- Volume growth without building any new origin infrastructure
- Advance data means customs pre-clearance — faster operations at Cairo OE
- EDI costs billed by UPU Telematics — standard DO billing, no new arrangements
- Same process works for any RMIG WPSP member — not Cainiao-specific
- Items managed entirely through existing IPS and DPS systems